Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 64% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - €22.88 vs €63.66
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than FX-4100 - 377 vs 368 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 304 minutes ago
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 304 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |