Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1420 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 62% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €22.88 vs €60.9
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than FX-4100 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 368 minutes ago
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 368 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |