Buy on Amazon
€22.88
In Stock
FX-4100 vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.
3.6 GHz | 4-core
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
2.8 GHz | 2-core
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
3.6 GHz | 4-core
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
2.8 GHz | 2-core
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1420 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.