Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms EPYC 7763 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 660 days newer than EPYC 7763.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7763
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7763 - 148 vs 128 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7763 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |