Buy on Amazon
€607.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1254 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than EPYC 7742 - 239 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 150 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€607.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Procesorius Intel CPU CORE I9-13900KS S1700 BOX/6.0G BX8071513900KS S RMBX IN
Buy for €607.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 24 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 150 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
