Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 475 days older than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than EPYC 7742 - 165 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 95 vs 225 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€260.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €260.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rome | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |