Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 881 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 128 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 28% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than EPYC 7742 - 682 vs 533 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
682
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€280.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €280.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19006 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 12 |
128 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |