Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 2015 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600T - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than EPYC 7551 - 160 vs 148 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Naples | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 14 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
