Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900T outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900T is 1650 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900T - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900T
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than EPYC 7551 - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i9-12900T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Single-Core
942
40.08510638297872%
Multi-Core
5942
48.68895444116683%
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Naples | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
