Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 292 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 155 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than EPYC 7302P - 533 vs 524 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
