Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 772 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 4% better in No Man's Sky than EPYC 7302P - 175 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 140 vs 155 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€703.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €703.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |