Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700K - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 12% better in The Last of Us Part I than EPYC 7302P - 149 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 125 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€363.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €363.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |