Buy on Amazon
€476.59
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 267 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than EPYC 7282 - 220 vs 216 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€476.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900K processor 3.7 GHz 20 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €476.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
