Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 541 days newer than Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 159 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Rome | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
