Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1581 days newer than Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 48% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Athlon 200GE - 732 vs 495 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €386 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75494 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
32.56410256410256%
Multi-Core
1857
10.784598408734537%
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |