Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 602 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €100.0 vs €141.58
- Up to 27% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-10400F - €0.4 vs €0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Athlon 200GE - 257 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 12 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3279 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
257
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
72%
Price, €
€141.58
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3280 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |