Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Tiburcc on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Tiburcc is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Tiburcc Computer PC
- Up to 36% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1399.00 vs €2199.00
- Up to 24% better value when playing F1 22 than EMCA4 - €6.57 vs €8.59 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 20% better in F1 22 than Tiburcc - 256 vs 213 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
Buy for €2,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
7th Variation
42nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
69%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
68%
42nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
42nd Variation
Ryzen 9 7900X
4.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2923
100%
Multi-Core
17849
100%
CPU Winner
Tiburcc Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-14500 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7900X |
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |