Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Tiburcc on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Tiburcc is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Tiburcc Computer PC
- Up to 21% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1399.00 vs €1769.00
- Up to 2% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than EMCA4 - €13.72 vs €14.04 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 24% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Tiburcc - 126 vs 102 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8181 minutes ago
Buy for €1,769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8183 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
7th Variation
51st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
69%
51st Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
51st Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
Tiburcc Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-14500 | CPU | Core i5-13600K |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
