Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper STGsivir on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing STGsivir is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of STGsivir PC
- Up to 45% cheaper than EMCA4 - €970.55 vs €1769.00
- Up to 6% better value when playing Minecraft than EMCA4 - €2.01 vs €2.13 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 72% better in Minecraft than STGsivir - 830 vs 483 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €970.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1069 minutes ago
Buy for €1,769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 531 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
6th Variation
51st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
25%
51st Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
51st Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
STGsivir PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-8700 | CPU | Core i5-13600K |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
