Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper STGsivir on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing STGsivir is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of STGsivir PC
- Up to 61% cheaper than EMCA4 - €970.55 vs €2459.00
- Up to 11% better value when playing Elden Ring than EMCA4 - €16.18 vs €18.21 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 125% better in Elden Ring than STGsivir - 135 vs 60 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €970.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1068 minutes ago
Buy for €2,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1068 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
6th Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
24%
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
47th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
STGsivir PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-8700 | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
