Key Differences
In short — Sedatech outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Sedatech PC
- Performs up to 150% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - 225 vs 90 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 86% cheaper than Sedatech - €829.00 vs €5849.90
- Up to 65% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Sedatech - €9.21 vs €26.00 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €5,849.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
4th Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Sedatech PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
