Key Differences
In short — Sedatech outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Sedatech PC
- Performs up to 68% better in Elden Ring than EMCA4 - 141 vs 84 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 85% cheaper than Sedatech - €859.00 vs €5849.90
- Up to 75% better value when playing Elden Ring than Sedatech - €10.23 vs €41.49 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €5,849.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 630 minutes ago
Buy for €859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
4th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
27%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Sedatech PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
