Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 67% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 149 vs 89 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €9.66 vs €10.55 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 35% cheaper than Memory - €939.0 vs €1439.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
10th Variation
FPS
89
59.73154362416108%
Value, €/FPS
€10.55/FPS
91.56398104265402%
Price, €
€939
100%
Buy for €939 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
33rd Variation
10th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
33rd Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
39.93912749408184%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31.9534632034632%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
33rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
10th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
95.66242338519567%
Multi-Core
8539
87.76852708397574%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
