Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than EMCA4 - 719 vs 712 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1439.0 vs €1649.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Minecraft than EMCA4 - €2.0 vs €2.32 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €1,439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74684 minutes ago
47th Variation
FPS
712
99.02642559109874%
Value, €/FPS
€2.32/FPS
86.20689655172414%
Price, €
€1649
87%
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
33rd Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
33rd Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
39.93912749408184%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31.9534632034632%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
33rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
68.39729119638827%
Multi-Core
9729
46.32857142857143%
47th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |