Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 19% better in Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - 134 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Megaport - €1099.0 vs €1229.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - €8.2 vs €10.79 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
40th Variation
FPS
113
84.32835820895522%
Value, €/FPS
€10.79/FPS
75.99629286376273%
Price, €
€1229
89%
Buy for €1,229 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
31st Variation
40th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
31st Variation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
40th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
70.9735576923077%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
56.77884615384615%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
40th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
null-core
Single-Core
2178
99.40666362391603%
Multi-Core
10263
100%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| Radeon RX 6750 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
