Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 14% better in No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - 171 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1429.0 vs €1449.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - €8.36 vs €9.66 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,429 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75667 minutes ago
50th Variation
FPS
150
87.71929824561403%
Value, €/FPS
€9.66/FPS
86.54244306418218%
Price, €
€1449
98%
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75673 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
38th Variation
50th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
38th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
61.464646464646464%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
62.1933621933622%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
38th Variation
Core i7-11700F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2101
78.95527996993611%
Multi-Core
8790
56.80129240710824%
50th Variation
Core i7-13700F
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2661
100%
Multi-Core
15475
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11700F | CPU | Core i7-13700F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
