Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 58% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - 147 vs 93 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 44% cheaper than Megaport - €799.0 vs €1429.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €8.59 vs €9.72 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
38th Variation
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.72/FPS
88.37448559670781%
Price, €
€1429
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,429 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75405 minutes ago
45th Variation
FPS
93
63.26530612244898%
Value, €/FPS
€8.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
38th Variation
45th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
38th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
45th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
59.64646464646465%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
42.60461760461761%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
38th Variation
Core i7-11700F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2101
95.8922866271109%
Multi-Core
8790
98.65319865319864%
45th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11700F | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
