Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 51% better in No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - 171 vs 113 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 45% cheaper than Megaport - €739.0 vs €1339.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €6.54 vs €7.83 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Buy for €739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
35th Variation
34th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
34th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
43%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |