Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper ERAZER on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 89% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than ERAZER - 36 vs 19 FPS
- Up to 46% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than ERAZER - €20.81 vs €38.75 per FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Desktop PC
- Up to 2% cheaper than Megaport - €736.31 vs €749.0
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 773 minutes ago
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
FPS
19
52.77777777777778%
Value, €/FPS
€38.75/FPS
53.703225806451606%
Price, €
€736.31
100%
Buy for €736.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 775 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
32nd Variation
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45.114309906858594%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39.475021168501264%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
32nd Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1555
70.97215883158376%
Multi-Core
6199
69.57351290684623%
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | ERAZER Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Feb 25th, 2022 |
| Ryzen 5 4500 | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
