Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper ERAZER on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ERAZER Desktop PC
- Up to 9% cheaper than EMCA4 - €752.31 vs €829.0
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 250% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than ERAZER - 70 vs 20 FPS
- Up to 69% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than ERAZER - €11.84 vs €37.62 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
FPS
20
28%
Value, €/FPS
€37.62/FPS
31%
Price, €
€752.31
100%
Buy for €752.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163937 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
70
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€829
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11725 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
ERAZER Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
