Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - 53 vs 50 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - €14.13 vs €14.98 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
32nd Variation
FPS
50
94.33962264150944%
Value, €/FPS
€14.98/FPS
94.32576769025367%
Price, €
€749
100%
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67554 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
53
100%
Value, €/FPS
€14.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€749
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67561 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
32nd Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
32nd Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1555
76.63873829472647%
Multi-Core
6199
72.5963227544209%
7th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
100%
Multi-Core
8539
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 4500 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
