Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 10% cheaper than EMCA4 - €749.0 vs €829.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - €7.27 vs €7.4 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 9% better in Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - 112 vs 103 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
32nd Variation
FPS
103
91.96428571428571%
Value, €/FPS
€7.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
54th Variation
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.4/FPS
98.24324324324323%
Price, €
€829
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
32nd Variation
54th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
54th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
32nd Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1555
73.31447430457332%
Multi-Core
6199
63.71672319868434%
54th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 4500 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |