Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper PC fisso on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 124% better in World of Warcraft than PC fisso - 211 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 14% better value when playing World of Warcraft than PC fisso - €7.34 vs €8.5 per FPS
Advantages of PC fisso Computer PC
- Up to 48% cheaper than Megaport - €799.0 vs €1549.0
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €1,549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 832 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
94
44.54976303317535%
Value, €/FPS
€8.5/FPS
86.3529411764706%
Price, €
€799
100%
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 835 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
26th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
26th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
Radeon RX 580
8 GB GDDR5 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.88 GPixel/s
27.070707070707073%
Texel Fillrate
193 GTexel/s
42.38032498902064%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
26th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Core i7-4770
3.4 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1188
41.625788367203924%
Multi-Core
3782
25.540248514316588%
Megaport PC | vs | PC fisso Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Core i7-4770 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | Radeon RX 580 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
