Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 41% better in World of Warcraft than Megaport - 211 vs 150 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 37% cheaper than Megaport - €949.0 vs €1499.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Megaport - €6.33 vs €7.1 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74788 minutes ago
24th Variation
FPS
150
71.09004739336493%
Value, €/FPS
€6.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€949
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74789 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
26th Variation
24th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
26th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
53.8510101010101%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
43.697848045674135%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
26th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
100%
CPU Winner
24th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
74.3167484232656%
Multi-Core
9729
65.70097244732577%
Megaport PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
