Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 54% better in Sea of Thieves than EMCA4 - 283 vs 184 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 72% cheaper than Gaming - €999.0 vs €3599.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Gaming - €5.43 vs €12.72 per FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for €3,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
40th Variation
FPS
184
65.01766784452296%
Value, €/FPS
€5.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€999
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
1st Variation
40th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
40th Variation
Radeon RX 7700 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
244.2 GPixel/s
55.062006764374296%
Texel Fillrate
549.5 GTexel/s
42.5968992248062%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
40th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
71.31809011432414%
Multi-Core
9729
48.28767123287671%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
