Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 7% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EMCA4 - 587 vs 550 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 9% cheaper than Gaming - €3099.0 vs €3399.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Gaming - €5.63 vs €5.79 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €3,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74246 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
550
93.69676320272572%
Value, €/FPS
€5.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3099
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €3,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
91.42568930733019%
Multi-Core
15172
75.30275957911455%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
