Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than EMCA4 - 81 vs 79 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 30% cheaper than Gaming - €969.0 vs €1379.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Dead Space than Gaming - €12.27 vs €17.02 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1177 minutes ago
38th Variation
FPS
79
97.53086419753086%
Value, €/FPS
€12.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€969
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €969 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
39th Variation
38th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
39th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
38th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
39th Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
100%
CPU Winner
38th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
88.56900931414056%
Multi-Core
8659
75.11928515658887%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
