Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Sedatech on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Sedatech - 144 vs 142 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Sedatech - €2179.0 vs €3294.9
- Up to 35% better value when playing Dead Space than Sedatech - €15.13 vs €23.2 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
35th Variation
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2179
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75640 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
142
98.61111111111111%
Value, €/FPS
€23.2/FPS
65.21551724137932%
Price, €
€3294.9
66%
Buy for €3,294.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75637 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
35th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
35th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB GDDR6 | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
59.52480200083369%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
85.0354314297624%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
35th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
87.48391248391249%
Multi-Core
15172
72.1034122231727%
3rd Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Sedatech PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
