Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - 249 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than EMCA4 - €2499.0 vs €2599.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - €10.04 vs €10.61 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €2,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 301 minutes ago
Buy for €2,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
29th Variation
44th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
29th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
44th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
29th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
44th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
4.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2918
94%
Multi-Core
19633
93%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
