Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 58% cheaper than Gaming - €999.0 vs €2379.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Gaming - €7.8 vs €10.08 per FPS
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 84% better in Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - 236 vs 128 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186125 minutes ago
Buy for €2,379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 401 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
29th Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
29th Variation
Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
54%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2620
100%
Multi-Core
15445
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i9-12900K |
| Radeon RX 6700 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
