Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 85% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - 98 vs 53 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - €14.89 vs €16.96 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 38% cheaper than Gaming - €899.0 vs €1459.0
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74704 minutes ago
10th Variation
FPS
53
54.08163265306123%
Value, €/FPS
€16.96/FPS
87.79481132075472%
Price, €
€899
100%
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74708 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
16th Variation
10th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
16th Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
50.6215173596228%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
40.500685871056234%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Core i5-13600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2747
100%
Multi-Core
15415
100%
CPU Winner
10th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
73.86239534037131%
Multi-Core
8539
55.39409665909828%
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
