Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Warcraft than Megaport - 156 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Megaport - €899.0 vs €949.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Megaport - €5.76 vs €6.33 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77831 minutes ago
24th Variation
FPS
150
96.15384615384616%
Value, €/FPS
€6.33/FPS
90.99526066350711%
Price, €
€949
94%
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77828 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
10th Variation
24th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72.22692633361558%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84.2506350550381%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
10th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
95.66242338519567%
Multi-Core
8539
87.76852708397574%
24th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
