Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Cyclon - outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Cyclon - PC
- Performs up to 67% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Megaport - 322 vs 193 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than GameMachines Cyclon - - €739.0 vs €1249.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than GameMachines Cyclon - - €3.83 vs €3.88 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
322
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.88/FPS
98.71134020618557%
Price, €
€1249
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43746 minutes ago
31st Variation
FPS
193
59.93788819875776%
Value, €/FPS
€3.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€739
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43745 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72.22692633361558%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84.2506350550381%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
31st Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
null-core
Single-Core
1555
65.83403895004234%
Multi-Core
6199
53.77808623232411%
GameMachines Cyclon - PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
