Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Cyclon - outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Cyclon - PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Escape From Tarkov than EMCA4 - 150 vs 145 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 34% cheaper than GameMachines Cyclon - - €829.0 vs €1249.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than GameMachines Cyclon - - €5.72 vs €8.33 per FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.33/FPS
68.66746698679471%
Price, €
€1249
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43744 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
145
96.66666666666667%
Value, €/FPS
€5.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€829
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43744 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
22nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
null-core
Single-Core
2092
88.56900931414056%
Multi-Core
8659
75.11928515658887%
GameMachines Cyclon - PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
