Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube – on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Cube – Gaming PC
- Up to 8% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1379.0 vs €1499.0
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 25% better in World of Warcraft than GameMachines Cube – - 207 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 13% better value when playing World of Warcraft than GameMachines Cube – - €7.24 vs €8.31 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €1,379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
55th Variation
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1499
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
2nd Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
null-core
Single-Core
2362
85%
Multi-Core
11527
74%
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
null-core
Single-Core
2769
100%
Multi-Core
15636
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cube – Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |