Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper PCSpecialist Prism on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 100% better in Dead Space than PCSpecialist Prism - 108 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing Dead Space than PCSpecialist Prism - €12.4 vs €14.8 per FPS
Advantages of PCSpecialist Prism PC
- Up to 40% cheaper than EMCA4 - €799.0 vs €1339.0
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
FPS
108
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1339
59%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 357271 minutes ago
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74896 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
24.372053150450064%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
24.382716049382715%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600
3.8 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2735
100%
Multi-Core
12259
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
80.10968921389396%
Multi-Core
8910
72.68129537482666%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | PCSpecialist Prism PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600 | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
