Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 660% better in Valheim than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 152 vs 20 FPS
- Up to 77% better value when playing Valheim than Ankermann Business V2 Work - €8.81 vs €37.95 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 43% cheaper than EMCA4 - €759.0 vs €1339.0
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
8th Variation
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1339
56%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361807 minutes ago
FPS
20
13.157894736842104%
Value, €/FPS
€37.95/FPS
23.214756258234516%
Price, €
€759
100%
Buy for €759 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GT 710
1 GB DDR3 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
0.6943849121303043%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
1.1111111111111112%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600
3.8 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2735
100%
Multi-Core
12259
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 7600 | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce GT 710 |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |