Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 220% better in Starfield than Megaport - 32 vs 10 FPS
- Up to 61% better value when playing Starfield than Megaport - €29.34 vs €74.9 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 20% cheaper than EMCA4 - €749.0 vs €939.0
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
FPS
32
100%
Value, €/FPS
€29.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€939
79%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €939 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74697 minutes ago
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74691 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
70.09038619556286%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
57.71461716937355%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2178
100%
Multi-Core
10263
100%
CPU Winner
31st Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1555
71.39577594123048%
Multi-Core
6199
60.40144207346779%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5800X | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
