Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 89 vs 80 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Megaport - €749.0 vs €1179.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €8.42 vs €14.74 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12843 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
89
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€749
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12842 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
6th Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84%
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2178
100%
Multi-Core
10263
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5800X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
