Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Tiburcc on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Tiburcc is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 16% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Tiburcc - 251 vs 216 FPS
Advantages of Tiburcc Computer PC
- Up to 38% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1495.0 vs €2399.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than EMCA4 - €6.92 vs €9.56 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 517 minutes ago
Buy for €1,495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 516 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
53rd Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
53rd Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB GDDR6 | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
57%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
53rd Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Tiburcc Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 7700 |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
