Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 102% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Megaport - 129 vs 64 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 51% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1179.0 vs €2399.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than EMCA4 - €18.42 vs €18.6 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Buy for €1,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
53rd Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
53rd Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB GDDR6 | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
17%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
20%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
53rd Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
